[gPXE] any negative implications of setting TCP window size to (65536 - 4) ?
H. Peter Anvin
hpa at zytor.com
Fri Feb 19 00:33:02 EST 2010
On 02/17/2010 12:39 PM, Glenn Brown wrote:
> If you don't support out-of-order reception, I don't see why a TCP stack
> needs to allocate storage for the whole window. If packets are
> processed as fast as they are received (in order) then it's enough to
> keep a single buffer posted at all times.
>
> So, why not advertise a dynamic window size and keep the small
> buffering? Doing so would prevent the window from throttling transfers
> on high round-trip-time connections.
The lack of out-of-order reception drastically increases the likelihood
that you will have to do an expensive recovery, especially over WAN
links. This problem really needs to be addressed.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
More information about the gPXE
mailing list