Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
soc:2009:oremanj:journal:week6 [2009/07/01 18:55]
rwcr
soc:2009:oremanj:journal:week6 [2009/07/10 14:06] (current)
rwcr
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Joshua Oreman: 802.11 wireless development ====== ====== Joshua Oreman: 802.11 wireless development ======
-===== Journal Week =====+===== Journal Week =====
  
 ==== Monday, 29 June ==== ==== Monday, 29 June ====
Line 62: Line 62:
  
 WPA is quite a complex system, and I'm very glad I was able to get it to work. If you want to get an idea of the stuff it's managing, you can compile with ''​DEBUG=net80211:​3,​sec80211:​3,​wpa:​3,​wpa_tkip:​3,​wpa_psk'';​ since I used ''​DBGC()'',​ the result is rather psychedelic :-) WPA is quite a complex system, and I'm very glad I was able to get it to work. If you want to get an idea of the stuff it's managing, you can compile with ''​DEBUG=net80211:​3,​sec80211:​3,​wpa:​3,​wpa_tkip:​3,​wpa_psk'';​ since I used ''​DBGC()'',​ the result is rather psychedelic :-)
 +
 +==== Thursday, 2 July ====
 +No code today; I needed to get caught up with my physics preparation,​ and had some other issues to take care of. I did have an impromptu meeting with the mentors this morning, which Marty suggested upon Michael'​s statement that he couldn'​t make our usual Saturday time.
 +  * Since I've completed (as of tomorrow) all the core wireless features I originally proposed, we discussed future plans.
 +  * Drivers:
 +    * I'll write a driver for ''​ath5k''​ (Atheros non-802.11n cards); they'​re quite widespread and are one of the few chipsets in common use that don't require custom firmware, so ath5k gPXE could feasibly be burned to a (larger than normal) EEPROM.
 +    * JH suggested support for the various Intel wireless drivers, as they'​re used for the built-in wireless on Centrino laptops. These do require firmware, though.
 +    * A USB wireless driver would be handy, but a USB stack is a little out-of-scope for the time I've got left in the summer :-)
 +  * Since we're certainly going to wind up with some wireless drivers requiring firmware files, how do we handle the firmware?
 +    * It seems most straightforward to treat them like all the other binary blobs we deal with, as images. That way they can be embedded.
 +    * One could either use an embedded image for firmware, or supply it to a ''​.lkrn''​-prefix gPXE as an initrd (using an eventual patch to support that). There would need to be some way of identifying it, and these files almost never have magic numbers. If we treat firmwares as embedded images always, we could add a field to the embedded image structure to override detected type, and have firmware-type never be autodetected. Another detection possibility is using file extensions; almost every firmware I've ever seen has an extension of ''​.fw'',​ ''​.bin'',​ or ''​.ucode'',​ with ''​.fw''​ being the most common. We could also wrap firmwares with a gPXE-specific header, but that's cumbersome.
 +    * If we go the embedded-image route, which seems likely, we can do things reasonably elegantly:
 +      * Extend the embedded image support to use a linker table, so multiple files can contain embedded images.
 +      * Have the gPXE build system treat everything in ''​firmware/''​ with a non-''​.c''​ extension as a vendor-supplied firmware, and make a ''​.c''​ file out of it in the same way as ''​embedded.c''​ is made using user-supplied embedded images.
 +      * Have each such autogenerated file also define a special symbol, along the lines of ''​obj_XXX'';​ maybe ''​firmware_XXX''​ where ''​XXX''​ is some identifier-ized version of the firmware filename.
 +      * Provide a function, ''​get_firmware()'',​ that can be called by a driver needing a firmware blob. If the blob exists (matching on filename) as a loaded image, it is unregistered from the image table, its image structure is freed keeping its data, and the ''​userptr_t''​ to the data is returned to the requesting driver. If the blob is not found, an error is returned.
 +      * Provide a macro, ''​REQUIRE_FIRMWARE()'',​ that works like ''​REQUIRE_OBJECT()''​ to pull the specified firmware file into the link by introducing a dependency on the ''​firmware_XXX''​ symbol. If the required firmware is not available, the link will fail. This would be used for drivers with freely distributable firmwares included with gPXE.
 +      * Provide a macro, ''​USE_FIRMWARE()'',​ to note a dependency on a certain firmware file without forcing it to be present for the link to succeed. There may be a way to use the linker for this, or it could define a symbol visible with ''​nm''​ and a script could add dependencies on those ''​firmware_XXX''​ symbols both requested and available. This would be used for drivers for which obtaining firmware requires jumping through some hoops (e.g. b43).
 +        * //Update 7/3//: After trawling linker documentation,​ I've found that the desired behavior can be effected using ''​REQUIRE_FIRMWARE()''​ plus a linker script that does ''​PROVIDE(firmware_XXX = 0);''​ for each firmware symbol that should not cause a link error if it is not present, but should still pull the firmware into the link if it is available. The easiest way to manage this is probably to require that each driver requiring non-included firmware place a linker script in ''​fw/''​ with the ''​PROVIDE()''​ commands in it, and include all of those scripts in the link.
 +  * Main wireless stack things:
 +    * WPA-Enterprise support //might// be useful.
 +  * Not-quite-wireless things:
 +    * We need a proper cryptographic RNG. I could look into using the Yarrow algorithm or a similar one, with as much real entropy as we can get from low-order bits of the TSC during timer interrupts.
 +
 +==== Friday, 3 July ====
 +WPA2 is working!
 +  * [[http://​git.etherboot.org/?​p=people/​oremanj/​gpxe.git;​a=commit;​h=fc7d95d70fd197319dc4f0138ba2df3705286e91|
 +[crypto] Make AES context size and algorithm structure externally available]]
 +  * [[http://​git.etherboot.org/?​p=people/​oremanj/​gpxe.git;​a=commit;​h=436b6980765eb7bb5061a8fd301affe9af0f8283|
 +[crypto] Add AES key-wrap mode (RFC 3394)]]
 +  * [[http://​git.etherboot.org/?​p=people/​oremanj/​gpxe.git;​a=commit;​h=b9025f9a595fd44e86b0957f12db4381de801010|
 +[wpa] Remove KIE encrypt function, and allow decrypt to return an error]]
 +  * [[http://​git.etherboot.org/?​p=people/​oremanj/​gpxe.git;​a=commit;​h=8f4e89b9e81bc2a3b714d7a49de1efd18c86e904|
 +[tkip] Make private functions static]]
 +  * [[http://​git.etherboot.org/?​p=people/​oremanj/​gpxe.git;​a=commit;​h=fdaaa4d9df9e43ce825d9b37e11126c9f36a7f31|
 +[wpa] Avoid recomputing Snonce during handshake + some minor tightening]]
 +  * [[http://​git.etherboot.org/?​p=people/​oremanj/​gpxe.git;​a=commit;​h=be6d51f8d83f42717d580b6df0057886b2f4119f|
 +[wpa] Add support for CCMP encryption (AES-based, WPA2 default)]]
 +
 +I was able to connect to a network that uses CCMP for unicast packets and TKIP for broadcast packets, and do DHCP (which uses broadcast) and chainload tomsrtbt (unicast) without any crypto errors. (The unicast/​broadcast cipher split is fairly common, because the broadcast cipher has to be supported by every node, while a unicast cipher can be negotiated with each node separately.)
 +
 +Before that, I discovered that writing a memory-processing loop like this:
 +  for ( i = nblk; i >= 1; i++ ) {
 +          /* ... */
 +  }
 +is a surefire road to a hair-pulling two-hour debugging session. Learn from my mistake, and don't write descending loops as ascending loops. :-)
 +
 +CCMP uses AES in two ways: in key-wrap mode (RFC 3394) to protect the group key in the 4-Way Handshake frames, and in counter mode with CBC-MAC (CCM; RFC 3610) to handle normal data packets. I implemented AES-wrap as a generic crypto function, since it is reasonably simple and does not have many tunable parameters; it doesn'​t have a ''​crypto_algorithm''​ structure, but that's just a matter of it being almost uniformly used for bite-sized chunks of data that are generally operated on in one piece. For CCM, I made the implementation private to WPA2 because that allowed me to make WPA2-specific size-saving assumptions about how it would be used. I kept the encryption and MACing code separate from the packet marshalling code, though, so if another use for CCM arises it should be fairly easily genericizable.
 +
 +This will be my last coding work until July 20. In the meantime I will be preparing for and competing in the [[http://​ipho2009.smf.mx/​home|2009 International Physics Olympiad]] in Merida, Mexico. Wish me luck! :-)
 +
 +After I get back: drivers drivers drivers...
  

QR Code
QR Code soc:2009:oremanj:journal:week6 (generated for current page)